Diputació de Barcelona
Entorn urbà i salut
 
Tools to incorporate the health perspective in municipal actions
 

Go-along or “moving interviews”

Kusenbach, M.
2016

Link to the resource: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/146613810343007

Format:
Scientific article
Target population:
General population and population in vulnerable situations
Objetive:

Through in-depth interviews carried out “in motion” in the daily environment of the person who is interviewed, capture their perceptions, reflections, memories and values linked to elements or aspects of the physical environment that they travel through every day. These elements may be insignificant or invisible for people from outside this environment.

Methodology:

Go-along, or “moving interviews”, take place in the interviewee’s everyday environment.

The interviewer accompanies the interviewee while they conduct the interview, which in turn is fed by the stimuli that appear when they are touring the neighbourhood.

There are different types of go-along: with a predetermined route, on foot, by bicycle and by car, among others. The “natural” modality, in which the interviewee leads the route and determines both the route and its duration, has proven to be the version that has the greatest potential to empower the person and allow the interviewer to access the most everyday aspects of their day-to-day life.

The interview can be recorded and transcribed and then analysed and coded for content analysis, and complemented with photography, route mapping and other similar techniques.

Opportunities and limitations:

Unlike other qualitative techniques such as participant observation or interviewing, the “moving interview” or go-along has the potential to access some of the significant, reflective aspects of the experience lived in situ.

It is suitable for areas that are undervalued or unconsolidated and subject to future transformations, as it can shed light on elements or aspects of the environment that are apparently conventional or even insignificant but are nevertheless valued by the local population that travels through it daily.

It allows a sensitive approach to place and its meaning, revealing people’s links with place, and with the potential to include or respect these aspects for the design of future transformations.

As it is a qualitative technique, it is well complemented by the use of quantitative techniques (e.g. surveys) and the use of quantitative indicators.

Indicators:
Perception and autonomy of people in the neighbourhood.
Percentage of people who feel they belong in the neighbourhood/community.
Percentage of people who feel they can influence their environment.
Distance from the dwelling to an open public space (green/not green).
Frequency of use of public facilities (e.g. library, cultural centre, sports facilities, etc.)
Type and frequency of use of public transport.
Thematic:
Cohesion and social capital Public space Green infrastructure Mobility and accessibility Equipment and services Housing and neighbourhood communities
Link to health:
Social Physical Mental
Scale of the field of study:
Neighbourhood (or higher) Housing / street / building / bounded public space Block - set of buildings or spaces
Implementation phase:
Diagnosis / pre-project Monitoring and evaluation Implementation
Methodological approach:
Qualitative / Participatory